Cronkite v. Oklahoma Attorney General
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA TERRY CRONKITE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. CIV-20-250-G ) STATE OF OKLAHOMA ex rel. ) OKLAHOMA ATTORNEY GENERAL, ) ) Defendant. ) ORDER Now before the Court is a Motion in Limine (Doc. No. 121) filed by Defendant State of Oklahoma ex rel. Oklahoma Attorney General (“Defendant” or OAG”). Plaintiff Terry Cronkite has responded (Doc. No. 138), and the matter is now at issue. As set forth below, the Motion in Limine (Doc. No. 121) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. I. Applicable Law A motion in limine is a “pretrial…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cummings v. Premier Rehab KellerSupreme Court of the United States · 2022
- Whitehead v. Food Max of Mississippi, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- Edens v. Netherlands InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- Jeanne L. Shultz v. Bernard Rice, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. AnayaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.