Legal Opinion

State v. Steinly

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 2015No. 20120715PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice LEE,

opinion of the Court:

T1 This is an interlocutory appeal in a pending eriminal case against Michael Steinly. In this case and in several others related to it, we consider the applicability of legislative amendments to the Indigent Defense Act (IDA), Utah Code sections 77-32-101 through -704. The amended provisions override this court's construction of the prior version of the statute in State v. Parduhn, 2011 UT 55, ¶¶ 23-30, 283 P.3d 488, by foreclosing an indigent defendant in a eriminal action from retaining private counsel while requesting public defense resources from the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Ake v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Snyder v. HertzskeUtah Supreme Court · 2017
  2. State v. EarlUtah Supreme Court · 2015
  3. State v. FolsomUtah Supreme Court · 2015
  4. State v. PerezUtah Supreme Court · 2015
  5. State v. Rodriguez-RamirezUtah Supreme Court · 2015

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API