Erickson v. Rubey

[¶ 19] I respectfully dissent largely for the reasons set forth in ray dissent in Matter of Rubey, 2012 ND 133, 818 N.W.2d 731.

[¶ 20] The evidence that Rubey remains a sexually dangerous individual has not gotten any more convincing in the year that he has been deprived of his freedom since the last review of his commitment.

[¶ 21] I quote only from the testimony given by the expert, Dr. Lynn Sullivan, whose testimony was offered in support of Rubey’s continuing commitment. His situation and behavior remain the same as it did at the last hearing:

Q. Okay. Has there been some other— outside of…