Legal Opinion

Protest 94919-K of Strauss-Eckardt Co.

United States Customs Court

Decided September 14, 1945No. 50488PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

At the trial the record in Kempner v. United States (11 Cust. Ct. 173, C. D. 820) was incorporated herein. There, similar shaving sets were held properly dutiable at 40 percent under paragraph 339 rather than at 50 percent under paragraph 230 (b) as mirrors. Although no samples from the present importation were retained, the exhibits in the incorporated case were in evidence. Plaintiff’s witness testified that the sets in question were similar to those in the incorporated case, the only difference being that some of the sets in the instant importation have upright stands…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kempner v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1943

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. British Industries Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API