Morley v. Berg
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtDunaway, J.
Under the provisions of Ark. Stats. (1947) 10-1001, sand and gravel (and other minerals not here involved) may be taken from the beds or bars of navigable rivers in the state upon procuring the consent of the Commissioner of Revenues, who shall issue licenses or permits for such removal under certain conditions prescribed in the statutes, with the advice and approval of the Attorney General. The licensee is required to pay a royalty to the state for sand and gravel removed commercially, and in addition a severance tax is levied. The right of the Commissioner to bring an action for collection…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Attorney General v. KarstonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1945
- State ex rel. Moose v. Southern Sand & Material Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
- C. M. Johnson Sand & Gravel Co. v. QuarlesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
3Cited by4 opinions
- State of Florida Ex Rel. Robert L. Shevin, Attorney General, Plaintiff v. Exxon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Burr v. Kansas City Public Service CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
- Morley v. BergSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1951
- State of Florida Ex Rel. Robert L. Shevin, Attorney General, Plaintiff v. Exxon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976