Legal Opinion

Farnsworth v. Kimball

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided October 8, 1914PublishedCited by 3 opinions

On report. Petition denied with costs. The petitioner asks for a review of a real action in which the defendants, Kimball and Coffin, were plaintiffs, and George B. Dorr was defendant, which case went to judgment at the April term, 1913, of the Supreme Judicial Court for Hancock County. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtSavage, C. J.

This is a petition for a review of a real action in which the present defendants, Kimball and Coffin, were plaintiffs and one George B. Dorr was defendant, and comes before this court on report. That case was tried and went to judgment at the April term, 1913, of the Supreme Judicial Court in Hancock County. It is admitted that during the pendency of that action and before trial or judgment, the record title of Dorr, the defendant, passed to the Bar Harbor Water Company, and that the title of Kimball and Coffin, the plaintiffs, had been bought and paid for by the Bar Harbor Water Company and…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Island Pond National Bank v. LacroixSupreme Court of Vermont · 1932
  2. W. H. Glover Co. v. SmithSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1927
  3. U.S. Bank National Association v. Jim A. GordonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API