State Ex Rel. Cunningham v. Davis
Supreme Court of Florida
1DissentEllis, P. J.
(dissenting). — I am unable to agree with the opinion and decision of the majority in this case because I think that, according to the allegations of the alternative writ and averments of the return the relators are entitled to a peremptory writ; that the relators have such an interest in the proceedings as to entitle them to question the legality of the enactment of Senate Bill No. 724 (which is claimed -by the Attorney General’s office to have been duly enacted at the regular session of the Legislature of the session of 1935 and numbered as Chapter 16848, Laws of Florida) and in pursuance…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Norton v. Shelby CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Amos v. GunnSupreme Court of Florida · 1922
- Stockton v. PowellSupreme Court of Florida · 1892
- State Ex Rel. Landis v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
- Curry v. MarvinSupreme Court of Florida · 1849
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.