Miller v. Milwaukee Odd Fellows Temple, Inc.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, C. J.
The outline of the pleadings and conclusions of law merely sketch the nature of the controversy. It is not deemed necessary to set out in full either the findings of the trial court or the objections to the title made by plaintiff’s attorneys. While the action is one in form for declaratory relief, it has all of the essential characteristics of an action for specific performance, for if it is adjudged that plaintiff secures a marketable'title by reason of the conveyance contracted for between him and the Temple corporation, neither party to the controversy could properly refuse further…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Lincoln Trust Co. v. Williams Building Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Franke v. MannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
- Wheeler v. SullivanSupreme Court of Florida · 1925
- Isaacs v. SchmuckNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
- State ex rel. Horton v. BrechlerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Auburndale State Bank v. Dairy Farm Leasing CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Hall v. Risley and HeikkilaOregon Supreme Court · 1950
- Lohmeyer v. BowerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1951
- Marathon Builders, Inc. v. PolingerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
- Venisek v. DraskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.