Legal Opinion
Rodman v. Young
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided July 24, 1996No. 94-830PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
2Per curiam
The plaintiff, Richard L. Rodman, appeals from an order of the Superior Court (Conboy, J.) dissolving an ex parte attachment. We vacate and remand.
*237In June 1994, the plaintiff, an attorney, brought suit against the defendant, Bonnie Young, for monies owed for legal services rendered in connection with her divorce. He obtained an ex parte attachment in the amount of $.10,000 against the defendant’s interest in real estate as security for a judgment. At the same time, the plaintiff obtained an ex parte attachment against a property settlement to be paid to the defendant…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Beland v. GossSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1894
- Kittredge v. WarrenSuperior Court of New Hampshire · 1844
- Lachance v. DonderoSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1940
4Cited by4 opinions
- Ford v. Skorich (In Re Skorich)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
- Charter Financial, Inc. v. Aurora Graphics, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
- In Re SkorichUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Hampshire · 2005
- LeBlanc v. BerubeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997