Legal Opinion

Bell v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided April 24, 1963No. 31926PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’CONNELL, Justice.

In compliance with our first decision, reported at Fla., 116 So.2d 617, this cause was remanded for further proceedings. Additional evidence was received by a different deputy commissioner who entered an order finding that claimant, Jack R. Bell, suffered a 21'% "permanent partial disability of the body as a whole as a result of the impact of the injury on claimant and his diminution of earning capacity.” The employer was ordered to pay compensation in accordance with this finding and to pay claimant’s attorneys $600.00 for their services.

Both parties sought review by the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. BellSupreme Court of Florida · 1959

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Walker v. Electronic Products & Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1971
  2. Corral v. McCrory CorporationSupreme Court of Florida · 1969
  3. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. BellSupreme Court of Florida · 1964
  4. Bill Bard Associates, Inc. v. TottenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API