Legal Opinion
State v. Strickland, 08ap-164 (11-18-2008)
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided November 18, 2008No. 08AP-164PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Michelle Strickland, appeals from a judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas ordering restitution as part of the sentence imposed upon defendant for one count of forgery. Defendant assigns a single error:
THE TRIAL COURT ABUSED THE DISCRETION GRANTED TO IT PURSUANT TO R.C. 2929.18 WHEN IT ORDERED DEFENDANT-APPELLANT TO PAY RESTITUTION IN THE AMOUNT OF $31,726.00.
Because the trial court's order that defendant pay $31,726 in restitution for her forgery conviction is supported by competent, credible evidence and in accordance with law, we affirm.
{¶…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Valhal Corp. v. Sullivan Associates, Inc., Architects, Planners, EngineersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- State v. GearsOhio Court of Appeals · 1999
- State v. CulverOhio Court of Appeals · 2005
- State v. HooksOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
- State v. SommerOhio Court of Appeals · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. SimmonsOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
- State v. WicklineOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- State v. KibbleOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
- State v. WeimertOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- Grove City v. SampleOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.