Legal Opinion

Buck Reiner Co. v. Chase & Worden

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 18, 1892PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Decatwr District Court. — Hon. John W. Harvey, Judge. Appeal by the plaintiffs from an order discharging the garnishee. The facts appear in the opinion.—

1Opinion of the CourtGiven, J.

This ease is submitted upon an agreed statement of facts, and involves the validity of the following assignment in writing:

“For value received, we hereby assign to D. M. Chase, as trustee, all our book accounts, as shown by our books, also promissory notes held by us on the following persons, for the several amounts set opposite their names, respectively [here follow the names of payees, dates and amounts of eleven promissory notes]. Said D. M. Chase to collect said notes and accounts, and pay the proceeds thereof to all of the creditors of Chase & Worden, pro rata, in proportion to the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Meeker v. SandersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1858
  2. Van Winkle v. Iowa Iron & Steel Fence Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1881
  3. Meyer, Strauss, Goodman & Co. v. Farmers & Traders' BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1889

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Turrill v. McCarthySupreme Court of Iowa · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API