Legal Opinion

Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Canadian Pacific Railroad

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1949Published

1Opinion of the CourtMurphy, J.

Motion is made by defendants in this action, which is brought by plaintiff as a third-party assignee pursuant to the provisions of section 29 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law, to eliminate from the caption and other parts of the pleading certain portions thereof wherein reference is made to the original plaintiffs. The claim of the injured workman, original owner of the claim, the latter having taken compensation and having failed to commence action against the asserted wrongdoer within the period prescribed in the statute, must be deemed automatically assigned under the law to the one “…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cummings v. . MorrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
  2. Skakandy v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
  3. Skakandy v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
  4. Commissioners of State Insurance Fund v. E. T. Clark Carting Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
  5. Maynes v. LucianoCity of New York Municipal Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API