Legal Opinion

Bishop v. Foley

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 8, 1918No. 21,353PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Atchison district court; William A. Jackson, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Marshall, J.:

The plaintiff commenced this action in the city court of Atchison to recover on a promissory note. On March 17,1915, judgment was rendered in favor of the defendants for $125. On March 20, 1915, the plaintiff filed a motion for a new trial, and on April 3, 1915, the motion was called for hearing. The docket of the city court recites the following:

“The defendants objected to the hearing of such motion for new trial for the reason the same had not been heard and determined by the court within five days from the date of trial, such objection…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Miller v. RichardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Thompson v. GreerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901
  3. Struber v. RohlfsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
  4. Dowell v. CaruthersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  5. Dickerson v. Burlington & Missouri River RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1890

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Buehne v. BuehneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1963
  2. Duncan v. RiderSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931
  3. Hallacy v. WhiteSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
  4. Geile v. KnowlesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API