Legal Opinion

Magnant v. Peacock

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided April 9, 1946PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, J.:

A bill was filed in the chancery court by the present appellant praying for a decree declaring her right to properties of an estate “to the extent of an undivided one-fifth interest thereof.” The chancellor granted a motion to dismiss; so there is presented to this court the matter of the sufficiency of the pleading or, to be more specific, the question whether he correctly construed the will and the codicil of one Charles John Peacock.

The appellees are the surviving sons of the testator;- appellant is the daughter of a son who predeceased him.

In the second paragraph of his will…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lines v. DardenSupreme Court of Florida · 1853
  2. Floyd v. SmithSupreme Court of Florida · 1910
  3. Smullin v. WhartonNebraska Supreme Court · 1905

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. DeRoche v. MitchellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
  2. Farmer v. BroadheadMississippi Supreme Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API