State v. Maluia
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Concurrence
Concurring Opinion by
ACOBA, J.
While I join in the majority,1 I write separately because, with all due respect, the *28dissent’s qualification of the “prosecutorial misconduct” test would distort the function assigned prosecutors under our system. As stated in the majority opinion, the fact is that “prosecutorial misconduct” is a broad term long employed in our cases. While the cases may, but do not always involve “bad faith or [an] inflammatory act” or necessarily an express violation of the Hawai‘1 Rules of Professional Conduct, they encompass these and other instances of error. As…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- State v. WongHawaii Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. DowsettHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1994
- State v. MoriwakiHawaii Supreme Court · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.