Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Maluia

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 2005No. 25689Published

1Concurrence

Concurring Opinion by

ACOBA, J.

While I join in the majority,1 I write separately because, with all due respect, the *28dissent’s qualification of the “prosecutorial misconduct” test would distort the function assigned prosecutors under our system. As stated in the majority opinion, the fact is that “prosecutorial misconduct” is a broad term long employed in our cases. While the cases may, but do not always involve “bad faith or [an] inflammatory act” or necessarily an express violation of the Hawai‘1 Rules of Professional Conduct, they encompass these and other instances of error. As…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. State v. WongHawaii Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State v. DowsettHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. State v. MoriwakiHawaii Supreme Court · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API