Legal Opinion

Fort v. People Ex Rel. Co-Operative Farmers' Exchange

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 9, 1927No. 11,588PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Butler

The plaintiff in error was adjudged guilty of contempt. He seeks a reversal of the judgment.

The Co-operative Farmers’ Exchange, as plaintiff, obtained a temporary injunction restraining Fort, the defendant below, -from inducing the breach of or the interference with the Exchange’s marketing contracts, and the interference with “any of the business of the Exchange”; particularly that the defendant refrain from buying or attempting to buy cabbage from any person having a marketing contract with the Exchange, with certain exceptions not necessary to repeat here. Thereafter the plaintiff filed a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cooper v. People Ex Rel. WyattSupreme Court of Colorado · 1889
  2. Wyatt v. the PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1892
  3. Fort v. Co-Operative Farmers' ExchangeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927
  4. Mullin v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
  5. Coulter v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. American Television & Communications Corp. v. ManningColorado Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. People v. HarrisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1939
  3. Fort v. Co-Operative Farmers' ExchangeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927
  4. People v. ProffittColorado Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Norquist v. NorquistSupreme Court of Colorado · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API