Legal Opinion

Williams v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 15, 1923No. 14920PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bloodwortií, J.

We will amplify the 3d'headnote only. Ground 4 of the motion for a new trial alleges that the movant should be given a new trial because when the case was called there were only forty-eight jurors in court, two of whom were disqualified, and that he was “entitled to have a panel of forty-eight jurors put upon him for the purpose of selecting the jurors in said case.” *174This ground does not show that then and there the accused, challenged the array in writing, as provided by section 998 of the Penal Code of 1910. In Moon v. State, 68 Ga. 694 (1), Justice Speer said: “It was the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Vaughn v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
  2. Moon v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1882
  3. Thomas v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1859
  4. Jackson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. James Lee Spencer v. Walter D. Zant, Superintendent, Georgia Diagnostic & Classification CenterCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
  2. Cauley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  3. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1954
  4. Hill v. StynchcombeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1969
  5. Dixson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API