Legal Opinion

State v. Babb

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided October 23, 1989No. 23092PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Harwell, Justice:

Appellant was convicted of two counts of check forgery. The issues discussed on appeal are whether the trial judge erred in (1) denying the appellant’s motion for a continuance and (2) denying the appellant’s motion for the suppression of the testimony of the State’s handwriting expert.

FACTS

Appellant, Charles Babb (Babb), was arrested for two counts of forgery on November 25,1987. At the bond hearing Babb was represented by both a public defender and a private attorney. The magistrate told Babb that he had a right to counsel, that he needed an attorney, and that he should…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. LyleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
  2. State v. GregorySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1941
  3. State v. SullivanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  4. State v. StromanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
  5. State v. MotleySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. OwensSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  2. State v. HugheySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  3. State v. MansfieldCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
  4. State v. HillSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  5. State v. MitchellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API