Legal Opinion

Dana Isbell v. Rogers Auto Sales.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided May 27, 2011No. 2100186PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMPSON, Presiding Judge.

Dana Isbell appeals from a summary judgment entered by the St. Clam Circuit Court in her action against Rogers Auto Sales (“Rogers”). 1 For the reasons set forth herein, we reverse and remand.

On January 7, 2006, Isbell purchased a vehicle from Rogers, an automobile dealership. The circumstances surrounding that purchase are in dispute. On January 26, 2006, Isbell filed an action against Rogers and its owner, Roger Ragan, in the St. Clair District Court. Her action was thereafter transferred to the St. Clair Circuit Court. In her complaint, Isbell alleged that she had…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Greene v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Flagstar Enterprises, Inc. v. FosterSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  3. McDowell v. BurfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  4. Ex Parte OwenSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Frazier v. CurryCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2013
  2. Henderson v. HendersonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2013
  3. Mobile County Department of Human Resources v. C.S.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2012
  4. J.O.J. v. R.M.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2015
  5. State Ex Rel. McCord v. Smith, 2100862 (ala.civ.app. 11-4-2011)Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API