Legal Opinion

Mitrofanis v. Smith

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1985PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Harold Baer, Jr., J.

Petitioner seeks in this CPLR article 78 proceeding to compel respondent Commissioner of the New York City Department of Buildings to declare the building owned by respondent Ninth Street New York Associates (Ninth Street Associates), at 105 East 9th Street, New York, New York, to be unsafe, to issue an order requiring the occupants of the building to vacate it, and to issue an order to demolish the building. Respondent Commissioner cross-moves to dismiss for failure to state a cause of action pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) and for failure to exhaust…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Watergate II Apartments v. Buffalo Sewer AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Nys Law Enforcement Employees v. CuomoNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. New York State Inspection, Security & Law Enforcement Employees, District Council 82 v. CuomoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Idlewild 94-100 Clark, LLC v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API