Patch v. Miller
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Edward A. Belcher, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
GRAY, C.
Action for work and labor. Plaintiff claimed -seven hundred and twenty dollars to be due her and appeals from a judgment in her favor for two hundred dollars.
The defendants are sued as executors of the last will and testament of J. M. Miller, deceased. The court found in the second finding as follows: “That for and during the period of two years immediately preceding the time of the decease of said J. M. Miller, hereinafter mentioned, the said- plaintiff, at the special instance and request of said J. M. Miller, rendered and performed certain work, labor, and services to and for the…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Swift v. Occidental Mining & Petroleum Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
- Cameron v. Ah QuongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- California Delta Farms, Inc. v. Chinese American Farms, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1927
- Socol v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Modoc Co-Operative Assn. v. PorterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.