State v. Van Winkle
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Lockett, J.:
Defendant appeals her conviction of possession of cocaine, K.S.A. 65-4127a, claiming (1) the conduct of the police was so outrageous that it constituted a violation of due process and (2) there was insufficient evidence to convict.
We recently recognized that law enforcement conduct may be so outrageous as to violate the Due Process Clause. State v. Nelson, 249 Kan. 689, 822 P.2d 53 (1991). If the conduct of government agents is not outrageous, the defense of entrapment may be available. Because of the length of the facts and their…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Sherman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Mathews v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Hampton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Jacobson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State v. LogsdonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
- State v. ClarkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1997
- State v. DukeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
- State v. KnightenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1996
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.