Legal Opinion

Nucor Corp. v. Mohr Construction Co.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 2, 1988No. 85-11-15; CA A45028Published

1Opinion of the CourtRiggs, J.

Plaintiff Nucor Corporation (Nucor) appeals a summary judgment entered in favor of defendant Riedel.1 It argues that Mohr Construction Systems (Mohr), which sold custom-made structural steel components, is a “construction agent” under ORS 87.005(3), so that plaintiff, the manufacturer of the steel components, is entitled to an Oregon construction lien under ORS 87.010(1) and that a question of material fact remains on this issue. We reverse and remand on the appeal and dismiss the cross-appeal as moot.

Collar Construction Company (Collar) was the general contractor for the Krusewoods One…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Timber Structures, Inc. v. C. W. S. Grinding & MacHine WorksOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Steel Products Co. of Oregon, Inc. v. Portland General Electric Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Steel Products Co. of Oregon, Inc. v. Portland General Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API