Legal Opinion
Zengerle v. Weiss
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided October 28, 1965PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
William C. Hecht, Jr., J.
The action against defendant Weiss, as attorney, is on a contract for stenographic and transcription services in recording and transcribing pretrial depositions. The action against defendants Regan et al., a law partnership, is for knowingly participating in the breach of the referred-to contract.
Appellant is engaged in the stenographic reporting business under the name of Holden Reporting Service. On February 4, 1958, she wrote a letter to respondent Weiss quoting the rate for taking depositions in the action Dale-Hilton v. Triangle, wherein Weiss was acting as…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wood v. . Duff-GordonNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Sinclair v. . PurdyNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Moran v. . Standard Oil Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1914
- McCall Co. v. WrightAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
- Bonynge v. . FieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re KellyNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
- Sansom Reporting, Inc. v. FeinerCivil Court of the City of New York · 1971