Hornsby v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, C. J.
By two separate accusations the defendant was accused of two separate misdemeanors. The cases were consolidated and the defendant was tried under both accusations, and separate verdicts of guilty were returned in each case, and separate judgments thereon were rendered. A single motion for a new trial covering both cases was made by the defendant and was overruled by the court, and the defendant filed one bill of exceptions seeking a review of that judgment. Held, that there is no authority of law for the defendant to bring both cases to the reviewing court by one bill of exceptions, and this…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Dickey v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- Futch v. MathisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
- Paschal v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
3Cited by5 opinions
- Dempsey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
- Holtzendorf v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
- Garner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
- Holtzendore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951