Legal Opinion

Boston & Montana Consolidated Copper & Silver Mining Co. v. Montana Ore Purchasing Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 1901No. 1,559PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Application for leave to file a petition for- a rehearing on the question of the qualification of F. Augustus Heinze as surety on a bond. Application denied.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion and order:

2Per curiam

The petition of the respondent Montana Ore Purchasing Company praying the court to grant a rehearing on the question of the qualification of F. Augustus Heinze as surety on the bond or undertaking of $550,000 heretofore filed in the action above entitled, or, in the alternative, that a re-examination of said Heinze as surety on said bond or undertaking be allowed, so as to enable him to give a detailed statement as to the value of all his property, to the end that the Montana Ore Purchasing Company and said Heinze may thereby be enabled to protect themselves as to their…

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wetzstein v. Boston & Montana Consolidated Copper & Silver Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Heinze v. KleinschmidtMontana Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Robinson v. LoganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API