Legal Opinion

Washington v. Finlay

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided November 17, 1981No. 80-1277PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES DICKSON PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge:

This is a vote dilution case in which the plaintiffs, asserting rights under the first, thirteenth, fourteenth and fifteenth amendments and 42 U.S.C. §§ 1971, 1973, and 1983, allege that the purpose and effect of the at-large election system for constituting the City Council in Columbia, South Carolina, is to dilute the voting rights of black citizens. The district court held against the plaintiffs on the merits, expressly determining that the at-large system did not violate the fourteenth or fifteenth amendments, and, without specifically addressing…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Washington v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Hansberry v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. Gomillion v. LightfootSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Republican Party of North Carolina v. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
  2. Initiative & Referendum Institute v. WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  3. Republican Party Of North Carolina v. James G. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
  4. Rev. Roy Jones v. The City of LubbockCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
  5. Major v. TreenDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1983

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API