Legal Opinion

Kahn v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided November 13, 1928No. Docket No. 13842Published

Petitioner and his wife with two others formed a partnership to engage in the real estate business, the profits from which were divided equally between the four partners. The wife's portion of the profits was taxed by respondent as income of the petitioner. Held, that the profits belonged to the wife and should not have been included in petitioner's income. L. F. Sunlin,6 B.T.A. 1232, and Earle L. Crossman,10 B.T.A. 248.

1Opinion of the Court

ALBERT KAHN, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

Kahn v. Commissioner

Docket No. 13842.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

14 B.T.A. 125; 1928 BTA LEXIS 3014;

November 13, 1928, Promulgated

Petitioner and his wife with two others formed a partnership to engage in the real estate business, the profits from which were divided equally between the four partners. The wife's portion of the profits was taxed by respondent as income of the petitioner. Held, that the profits belonged to the wife and should not have been included in petitioner's income. L. F. Sunlin,6 B.T.A. 1232,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sunlin v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1927
  2. Kahn v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API