Legal Opinion

People v. Oldham

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 31, 2000No. D031986PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HUFFMAN, Acting P. J.

In this case, we conclude that the trial court properly denied Charles Anthony Oldham’s motion to suppress evidence under Penal Code 1 section 1538.5 brought on the ground his father Charles Oldham, Sr. (Father), could not consent to a search of the bedroom defendant occupied in the apartment they shared and that, consistent with the holding of People v. Williams (1999) 20 Cal.4th 119 [83 Cal.Rptr.2d 275, 973 P.2d 52] (Williams), Oldham cannot raise for the first time on appeal the issue of whether the police officers conducting the search had a good faith belief…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Illinois v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Florida v. JimenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. People v. JenkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. VerlindeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  2. People v. D.C.California Court of Appeal · 2010
  3. Lindsey-Anderson v. USAA Casualty Ins. Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2025
  4. P. v. Marquez CA6California Court of Appeal · 2013
  5. People v. Hines CA3California Court of Appeal · 2014

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API