Cooke v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.
North Dakota Supreme Court
Appeal from District court, Stutsman county; Burke, J. Action by John D. Cooke against the Northern Pacific Railway Company. Prom an order denying a new trial after direction of verdict for «defendant, plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
Pollock, Special Judge.
This is an appeal from an order denying a motion for a new trial. Certain irregularities with reference to the admission of testimony, as well as errors of law occurring at the trial, are claimed, all of which were duly excepted to. There are twenty-two specifications of error, most of them with reference to the introduction of evidence. In order to properly consider these alleged errors, it will be necessary to analyze the issues as presented by the pleadings.
*268Among other things, the plaintiff alleges: That on March 7, 1907,, he delivered, in good condition, to the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Nelson v. Great Northern Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1903
- Supervisors of Kewaunee County v. DeckerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872
- Clark v. St. Louis, Kansas City, & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1877
- McTavish v. Great Northern Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1899
- Southern Pac. Co. v. ArnettCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Cook v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
- Knapp v. Minneapolis, St. Paul, & Sault Ste, Marie Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
- Morrell v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1920
- Rivinius v. HuberNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1946
- Hovsepian v. EskenderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.