Legal Opinion

State v. Begay

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 6, 2010No. D080840M; A139130Published

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.

Defendant appeals from the judgment of his conviction for interfering with public transportation, ORS 166.116(l)(a), assigning error to the denial of his motion for a judgment of acquittal (MJOA). In particular, defendant contends that he had not “enter[ed] or remain[ed] unlawfully in * * * [a] public transit station,” ORS 166.116(l)(a), in violation of a TriMet exclusion order because the area at the Hillsboro Transit Center where he was walking when he was arrested was not a “Transit Dedicated Light Rail Platform[ ]” as defined in the Notice of Exclusion. We agree with defendant and,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. HallOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Friends of Yamhill County v. Yamhill CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  3. Kelly v. HochbergCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API