Carlton Hart v. State of Indiana

PYLE, Judge.

Statement of the Case

[1] Carlton Hart (“Hart”) appeals his convictions, after a jury trial, for murder, 1 Class B felony criminal confinement, 2 and Class B felony conspiracy to commit criminal confinement. 3 On appeal, Hart argues that the evidence was insufficient to support his convictions as an accomplice and that the trial court erroneously allowed the State to redact details of a peace treaty he brokered between rival rap groups from his statements to police. Concluding that the evidence supported Hart’s convictions as an accomplice and that the trial court did not err in…