Mouradian's Case
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the Court
Final decree affirmed subject to amendment in respect of interest. The findings of the single member on adequate evidence, adopted by the reviewing board, established that the employee after his injury was incapable of doing his former heavy work and did do lighter work as a route salesman; also that in connection with his new job he had to pay $30 a week out of his own pocket to operate his automobile. The decision deducted this sum from gross weekly earnings in determining the post-injury net earnings in the computation of partial disability compensation. This was right. New Amsterdam Cas.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Powers's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. StensMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
3Cited by1 opinion
- York v. Unionville Volunteer Fire DepartmentCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982