Legal Opinion
C v. St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 18, 2007Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Eileen Bransten, J.
In motion sequence number 05, defendant St. Luke’s-Roosevelt Hospital Center moves for an order precluding plaintiff’s experts Leon Charash, M.D. and Vicki Sudhalter, Ph.D. from testifying as to causation at the trial of this matter, or alternatively seeks a Frye hearing to determine whether the doctors’ opinions as to causation are generally accepted in the medical community as reliable.
Plaintiff, C, an infant, by his mother and natural guardian, Wanda Williams, vehemently opposes the motion.
Background
In this medical malpractice action plaintiff alleges…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- People v. WesleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Marsh v. SmythAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Lara v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Nonnon v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Parker v. Mobil Oil Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.