Legal Opinion

Harris v. Harris

Ohio Superior Court, Cincinnati

Decided December 15, 1906Published

1Opinion of the CourtHoeei-ieimer, J.

Heard on motion for allowance of attorney fees.

The only question before me is as to whether this is a proper proceeding for the allowance of the fees claimed. The taxing of attorney fees is of course exceptional and is limited to certain classes of cases. It is contended that this case is not within the rule, and reliance is chiefly had on Hopple v. Hopple, 4 N. P.—N. S., 255. That ease, however, instead of being an authority against the allowance of fees in the particular case before me, plainly shows the reasons why the fee claimed in this ease shoidd be allowed. In the Hopple case there…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Trustees v. GreenoughSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Central Railroad & Banking Co. of Ga. v. PettusSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. Maney v. CasserlyMichigan Supreme Court · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API