Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Rucker v. King Const. Co.

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1931No. 29088PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcGowen, J.

The King Construction Company filed its bill against W. H. Bucker in the chancery court of Leflore county seeking to recover a balance of interest alleged to be due on certain machinery used for mining gravel; also it sought a reformation of the contract as to a date and accounting as to the quantity of gravel mined by Eucker with said machinery.

The applicable part of the lease contract is in these words:

‘ ‘ The terms of said lease shall be until April 15, 1921, and as long thereafter as the party of the second part (W. H. Eucker), his heirs or assigns, may require the same.

“Provided that the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Clayton v. ClarkMississippi Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Cooper v. Yazoo & Mississippi Valley RailroadMississippi Supreme Court · 1903
  3. May Bros. v. DoggettMississippi Supreme Court · 1929
  4. A. Greener & Sons v. P. W. Cain & SonsMississippi Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Phillips v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Roberts v. FingerMississippi Supreme Court · 1956
  2. State Highway Department v. DuckworthMississippi Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Wunderlich v. State Highway CommissionMississippi Supreme Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API