Legal Opinion

Estate of Stanley G. Miller v. Diane Storey

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 2017No. 2014AP002420Published

1Dissent 1

¶ 114.

2Dissent · AbrahamsonShirley S. Abrahamson, J.

Unlike the majority, I conclude that civil theft is an "action based in tort" within the meaning of Wis. Stat. § 799.01(l)(cr). Therefore, the Estate's compensatory damages should be capped at $5,000, and the Estate is not entitled to double costs.1

¶ 115. In reaching an opposite conclusion, the majority relies entirely on unremarkable truisms and simply ignores the wealth of prior cases in which Wisconsin courts have either explicitly or implicitly characterized certain statutory causes of action as "torts" or as "sounding in tort."

¶ 116. The majority repeatedly draws distinctions…

3Cases cited13 opinions

  1. North Bay Regional Center v. MaldonadoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Watkins v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Shands v. CastrovinciWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Fandrey v. American Family Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Cave Creek Unified School District v. DuceyArizona Supreme Court · 2013

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API