Legal Opinion

State v. Singletary

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 3, 2016No. 15-1125PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TYSON, Judge.

*369 Christopher Lee Singletary ("Defendant") appeals from judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of sexual offense of a child by a substitute parent, indecent liberties with a child, and two counts of sexual offense with a child; adult offender. We find no prejudicial error in Defendant's trial.

The trial court followed the sentencing procedures prescribed by N.C. Gen.Stat. § 14-27.4A(c), now codified at N.C. Gen.Stat. § 14-27.28(c), in sentencing Defendant. Those procedures do not require prior notice to Defendant of the State's or the trial court's intent to seek or impose…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Cunningham v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cole v. N.C. Dep't of Pub. SafetyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
  2. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019
  3. NAPCO, INC. v. LANDMARK TECHNOLOGY A, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2021
  4. State v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
  5. State v. GillardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2024

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API