Legal Opinion

Foreman v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 16, 1930No. 13252Published

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

HAWKINS, Judge.

Appellant claims the facts are identical with those in Allen v. State, 20 S. W. (2d) 1056, which were held insufficient. In this case officers discovered appellant and one Wilke at a still which was in operation. They were sitting on a log about ten steps from the still. Both of them ran when the officers were discovered. When the officers started to burn up the still appellant claimed a coat which he had left lying on the log where he and Wilke were sitting. It was not shown upon whose land the still was located, but it was between Robison’s place, for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Allen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API