Legal Opinion

In Re Christensen

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided April 29, 1994No. 393-33646-H13, CV 94-242-PAPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PANNER, District Judge.

Appellant Jeffrey Christensen appeals the November 1, 1993 order of the Bankruptcy Court denying his motion for sanctions against Respondent Oregon Construction Contractors Board 1 and denying his contention that Respondent’s Final Order in claim No. 71836-103 is void. I have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158(a) and Bankruptcy Rules 8002(a) and 9006(a). The decision of the Bankruptcy Court is affirmed in part and reversed in part. Respondent’s order of August 17,1993 violated the automatic stay and was void ab initio. Appellant’s motion for sanctions is…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Hutto v. FinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Mullis v. United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of NevadaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  4. Missouri v. Jenkins Ex Rel. AgyeiSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Hoffman v. Connecticut Department of Income MaintenanceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wyoming Department of Transportation v. Straight (In Re Straight)District Court, D. Wyoming · 1997
  2. In Re Mohawk Greenfield Motel Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API