Legal Opinion
United States v. Elimelech Naiman
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided April 27, 2000No. 1999PublishedCited by 67 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POOLER, Circuit Judge:
Elimelech Naiman appeals from the judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Charles P. Sifton, then-Chief Judge) convicting him after a seven-week jury trial of one count of misapplication of funds in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 666(a)(1)(A), one count of bribery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 666(a)(2) and five counts of mail fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1341. 1 Naiman asks that we re verse his convictions on Counts 2, 3,12,13, 14, 15 and 18 because the evidence was insufficient to sustain the convictions. Appellant also argues…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Salinas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. John WalshCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- United States v. DiazCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Armand P. D'AmAtoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Regent Office Supply Co., Inc., and Oxford Office Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- United States v. Fred Snow, Marcus Snow, Rahad RossCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Gurmeet Singh DhinsaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- George Lindstadt v. John P. Keane, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- United States v. QuinonesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Ruben Feliciano, AKA Rude Dog, AKA Roob Dog, Ronald Pagan, AKA Twin, and Nelson Gonzalez, AKA Snoop,defendants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.