Legal Opinion

State v. Magouirk

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 19, 1994No. 19537PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PREWTTT, Judge.

Following nonjury trial defendant was convicted of sodomy. § 566.060.3, RSMo Supp. 1992. A request for probation was denied and defendant was sentenced to 5 years’ imprisonment. Defendant appeals, presenting two points relied on.

Relying primarily on State v. Bernard, 849 S.W.2d 10, (Mo. banc 1993), and State v. Phillips, 854 S.W.2d 803 (Mo.App.1993), defendant contends that the trial court erred in allowing testimony concerning uncharged acts of sexual misconduct committed by defendant upon the victim. Bernard did not involve prior acts against the victim as is the case here.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. BernardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. State v. GrahamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
  3. State v. DouglasMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. State v. GunterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. State v. PhillipsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. PrimmSupreme Court of Missouri · 2011
  2. State v. GateleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. State v. CarrilloMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. State v. MooreMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. State v. TownsendMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API