State v. Magouirk
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
PREWTTT, Judge.
Following nonjury trial defendant was convicted of sodomy. § 566.060.3, RSMo Supp. 1992. A request for probation was denied and defendant was sentenced to 5 years’ imprisonment. Defendant appeals, presenting two points relied on.
Relying primarily on State v. Bernard, 849 S.W.2d 10, (Mo. banc 1993), and State v. Phillips, 854 S.W.2d 803 (Mo.App.1993), defendant contends that the trial court erred in allowing testimony concerning uncharged acts of sexual misconduct committed by defendant upon the victim. Bernard did not involve prior acts against the victim as is the case here.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. BernardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- State v. GrahamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
- State v. DouglasMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
- State v. GunterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
- State v. PhillipsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. PrimmSupreme Court of Missouri · 2011
- State v. GateleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
- State v. CarrilloMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
- State v. MooreMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
- State v. TownsendMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.