Legal Opinion

First Kentucky Company v. William M. Gray, District Director of Internal Revenue for Kentucky

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided November 21, 1962No. 14595_1PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOYD, District Judge.

The appellant is a Kentucky corporation engaged in the business of making investments. It instituted this suit in the District Court for refund of $21,-007.98, income taxes paid under protest, plus interest. The payment of these taxes was made by appellant as a result of a deficiency assessment for the year 1954 by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue on the theory that accrued interest in default was part of the sale price of railroad bonds sold “flat” by the appellant, which part should have been declared by appellant as ordinary income for tax purposes. The appellant…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Helvering v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Fisher v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1954
  3. Simon Jaglom and Marie Jaglom v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
  4. Shattuck v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1955
  5. Missouri Pacific Railroad Co. 5¼% Secured Serial Bondholders' Committee v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1955

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Darby Investment Corporation v. Commissioner or Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1963
  2. Marian A. Byrum, Under the Last Will and Testament of Milliken C. Byrum, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1971
  3. Jones v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1966
  4. Horst v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
  5. Afia Finance Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1963

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API