Legal Opinion

Schultheis v. Fishman

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1909Published

Action to foreclose a mortgage.

1Opinion of the CourtErlanger, J.

The action is to foreclose a mortgage. Two of the defendants desire to serve an answer to the complaint, but claim that they cannot safely do so because the pleader has failed to number the paragraphs of the complaint which consists of five pages. I think the motion should prevail. A denial of a particular paragraph is good. Fleming v. Supreme Council, 32 App. Div. 231. But a denial between certain folios has been condemned. Avery v. N. Y. C. R. R. Co., 6 N. Y. Supp 547, 548; Varnum v. Hart, 47 Hun, 23, Caulkins v. Bolton, 98 N. Y. 511— 514. A defendant should not incur the hazard of having…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Fleming v. Supreme CouncilAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API