Legal Opinion

Kay v. Swimmer

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 26, 1963No. 62-327PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HORTON, Judge.

Appellants, defendants below, seek review of an adverse final judgment by default which was entered consequent upon their failure to attend and submit themselves for depositions upon oral interrogatories after being duly served with notice pursuant to the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure. The judgment was entered under the aegis of Rule 1.31(d), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, 30 F.S.A., and based solely upon the complaint- and certain exhibits attached thereto. No other proof of damages was evident or offered.

The complaint alleged that the parties entered into a written…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of Miami Beach v. WolfeSupreme Court of Florida · 1955
  2. White v. SpearsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Overseas Equip. Co., Inc. v. Aceros ArquitectonicosDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  2. Ganem v. GanemDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
  3. Automated Management System of Florida, Inc. v. Thomson & McKinnon, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API