State v. LaPierre
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Dissent
CALKINS, J.,
with whom CLIFFORD, J., joins, dissenting.
[¶ 25] I respectfully dissent. The Court today announces a rule that requires a trial court, when instructing on a lesser included offense after a jury has begun deliberations, to state fully all of the elements of the lesser included offense, and restate the elements of the greater offense. I do not dispute the wisdom of advising the trial courts to so instruct in the future. I do, however, dispute that the instructions given in this case were so highly prejudicial, or so tainted the proceeding, that LaPierre was deprived of a fair tidal.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. DanielsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
- State v. VarneySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
- State v. WrightSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1987