Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. LaPierre

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided June 23, 2000Published

1Dissent

CALKINS, J.,

with whom CLIFFORD, J., joins, dissenting.

[¶ 25] I respectfully dissent. The Court today announces a rule that requires a trial court, when instructing on a lesser included offense after a jury has begun deliberations, to state fully all of the elements of the lesser included offense, and restate the elements of the greater offense. I do not dispute the wisdom of advising the trial courts to so instruct in the future. I do, however, dispute that the instructions given in this case were so highly prejudicial, or so tainted the proceeding, that LaPierre was deprived of a fair tidal.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. DanielsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
  2. State v. VarneySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
  3. State v. WrightSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API