Legal Opinion
Davis v. Lukhard
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided August 20, 1984No. Civ. A. No. 84-0126-RPublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WARRINER, District Judge.
Judgment was entered herein on 29 June 1984, 591 F.Supp. 319. On 10 July plaintiffs filed their motion under Fed.R. Civ.P. 59(e) asking the Court to vacate the judgment. The motion is untimely and must be dismissed. The tenth day after 29 June is 9 July, a Monday. Thus the time limit set in Rule 59(e) was not met by plaintiffs. Fed.R.Civ.P. 6(b) denies the Court the power to enlarge the time for the filing of a motion under Rule 59(e). The additional three days provided by Rule 6(e) do not apply to judgments which are not the subject of “service,” whether or…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Robert W. Flint, Jr. v. Francis Howard, Warden, Adult Correctional InstitutionCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1972
- Ronald Reynolds v. Hunt Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Davis v. LukhardDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1984
- Johnson v. City of RichmondDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1984
3Cited by28 opinions
- Waye v. First Citizen's National BankDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
- Dominic M. Cavaliere v. Allstate Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
- Standard Quimica De Venezuela v. Central Hispano International, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1999
- Dodge v. Susquehanna UniversityDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
- Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1989
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.