Legal Opinion
State of Minnesota v. Karp
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided October 11, 1948No. 6972PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By MATTHEWS, PJ.:
This is an appeal from a judgment for the defendant following the sustaining of a demurrer to the plaintiff’s amended petition. The grounds of the demurrer were (1) that the court had no jurisdiction of the subject of the action; (2) that the plaintiff had no legal capacity to sue; (3) that there was a defect of parties plaintiff; and, (4) that the amended petition did not state facts constituting a cause of action. The order sustaining the demurrer does not disclose the respect in which the court found the amended petition to be defective.
The plaintiff seeks to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Shaffer v. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Milwaukee County v. M. E. White Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Dewey v. Des MoinesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Illinois Central Railroad Company, Appt. v. Wirt AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State of California v. St. Louis Union Trust Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1953
- T. Ryan Legg Irrevocable Trust v. Testa (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
- State Tax Comm'n of Utah v. CordNevada Supreme Court · 1965
- FIA Card Services, N.A. v. SalmonOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
- State Tax Comm'n of Utah v. CordNevada Supreme Court · 1965
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.