Legal Opinion

In Re Handelsman

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided July 26, 2005No. Docket 252205PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondent Frances Goldman appeals by right an order granting partial summary disposition for petitioner. MCR 7.203(A)(2); MCR 5.801(B)(1). This appeal arises from a protracted dispute between two sisters, daughters of the late Sarah “Sally” Handelsman (Handelsman). Respondent Goldman is one of the sisters; the other, Rochelle Schultz, is married to Lowell Schultz. We hold the trial court did not err in granting partial summary disposition because there was no genuine issue of material fact to decide at trial. We also hold that a gift of the right to receive rents is not a conveyance of an…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Maiden v. RozwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. West v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Skinner v. Square D Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Smith v. Globe Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Corley v. Detroit Board of EducationMichigan Supreme Court · 2004

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Innovative Adult Foster Care, Inc v. RaginMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. Face Trading, Inc. v. Department of Consumer & Industry ServicesMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Wilson v. Sparrow Health SystemMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. Shepherd Montessori Center Milan v. Ann Arbor Charter TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Alicia S Rowe v. Patrick and Carrie LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API